Continuing the page kept by Gerhard Woeginger, 1996–2016.
Post-2016 Register census entry 118
An approach to P versus NP in Classical Propositional Logic
A post-2016 Register census entry for a claimed P = NP result by Mark Inman. It was not part of Woeginger’s frozen list and remains an unadjudicated candidate.
The Register publishes this census record without endorsing or adjudicating the mathematical claim.
Unadjudicated does not mean endorsed.
No refutation is recorded in the census data. Absence of a located response is not evidence that none exists.
Register census note
Inclusion basis
The abstract explicitly claims a polynomial algorithm and P=NP.
Links recorded by the census
The same link-list treatment is used across both corpora. These 63 post-2016 URLs carry the census’s dated link state; the 45-of-174 link-rot statistic remains explicitly historical.
Link status recorded by the census on 24 July 2026. This dated census status is separate from the held 174-link historical HEAD probe.
Post-2016 census provenance
Source
post-2016 discovery sweep
Venue type
arXiv
Arxiv id
1708.05714
V1 date
2017-08-18
Latest version
v2 (2018-04-23)
Status
current
Discovery queries
arXiv all:"P versus NP" + resolution language
arXiv abs:"we prove that P=NP"
Cite this dossier
Plain text
The P versus NP Register. “Dossier 118: An approach to P versus NP in Classical Propositional Logic.” Post-2016 Register census entry; as of 26 July 2026.
BibTeX
@misc{pvnp-register-118-2026,
author = {{The P versus NP Register}},
title = {An approach to P versus NP in Classical Propositional Logic},
year = {2026},
note = {Post-2016 census dossier 118; unadjudicated; as of 2026-07-26}
}